Discover the Best AI Skills

Execute a user-supplied PatSnap advanced patent query containing field operators such as ANCS:, TAC_ALL:, DESC_B:, MAINF:, ALL_AN:, PN:, APD:, PBD:, APNO:, or PRNO:, then generate an evidence-backed competitor patent report with portfolio counts, company-level technical summaries, hierarchical patent details, optional literature context, Markdown output, and an accessible HTML rendering. Use when the user explicitly asks to run a PatSnap query or create a report from one; require verified PatSnap MCP or documented global API access and never collect credentials in chat.

Review supplied US patent application claims and relevant specification, drawings, Office-action, and prosecution context for claim quality, prosecution readiness, 35 U.S.C. 101/102/103/112 risk, BRI, 112(f), dependency/form, restriction/election, continuation/divisional strategy, infringement observability, and amendment options. Use for US claim review, drafting quality control, amendment strategy, or a structured claim issue list.

Review claims in a Japanese patent application or a PCT/Paris-route application intended for Japan across six dimensions: Japanese Patent Act/JPO compliance, evidence-backed novelty and inventive-step pre-screening, claim architecture and drafting quality, JPO examination risk, foreign-origin and translation risk, and strategic protection. Use when the user provides Japanese or foreign-language application materials and asks for a JPO-oriented claim review, amendment options, prosecution-readiness assessment, prior-art comparison, or a complete English HTML claims report.

Review the quality, reproducibility, legal reasoning, and decision usefulness of an existing freedom-to-operate (FTO), patent-infringement-risk, or event IP risk report. Use for three-layer evidence review, four-dimension scoring, independent multi-route search comparison, omission analysis, fatal-defect screening, remediation planning, or HTML assessment generation. The skill audits a supplied report; it does not replace a jurisdiction-specific legal opinion.

Review European patent application claims and supporting application materials for EPO/EPC examination readiness. Use when a user uploads or cites a European patent application, claim set, specification draft, Euro-PCT text, PCT application intended for the European phase, or foreign-language filing intended for Europe, or asks for EPC Articles 84, 83, 123(2), 82, 54 or 56 analysis, Rule 43 practice, unity review, claim interpretation, claim-amendment options, fallback positions, or European patent attorney-style drafting quality control.

Assess underused patents and related intangible assets, cluster them into decision-ready packages, evaluate internal reuse and transaction options, research candidate counterparties, and create evidence-backed portfolio activation deliverables. Use for patent portfolio activation, maintenance review, outbound licensing or assignment screening, transaction-readiness review, internal R&D reuse, candidate buyer/licensee research, management reporting, or a 30/60/90-day activation plan.

Generate and prioritize experimentally testable target hypotheses from one or more small-molecule structures. Use when a user supplies SMILES or a compound library and asks which targets the molecules may modulate, how structural neighbors and SAR support the hypotheses, which biological and competitive evidence should be checked, or which compounds and targets should advance to orthogonal validation.

Monitor patent-litigation exposure for a primary company and up to four named comparison parties. Use when users need target-centric identification of potentially litigated patents, patent-family and claim analysis, verified proceeding timelines, case deep dives, inventor activity, geographic exposure, litigation alerts, technology trends, and an evidence-backed HTML report with structured JSON or CSV attachments.